Curriculum alignment, made structural

From standards to the classroom.
Every step traceable.

Most schools can't trace a single assessment item back to the standard it claims to measure. makes that connection structural — built in as you design, not verified after. Standards to objectives, objectives to assessments, assessments to lessons. The alignment your accreditor wishes you already had.

Alignment MapCross-Course Coverage
SCI 3
SCI 5
ESCI 6
LSCI 7
Patterns
I
D
D
M
Cause & Effect
I
I
D
D
Systems
I
D
M
Energy & Matter
I
I
D
Structure
I
D
M
M
Science Dept.5 Cross-Cutting ConceptsI → D → M Progression

Schools claim alignment.
They can't prove it.

Between objectives and what actually gets taught and tested, alignment erodes — quietly, across dozens of courses, over years. By the time an accreditation review asks for evidence, teams are scrambling to retrofit coverage maps that should have been built into the design from the start.

eliminates that gap. Alignment isn't a report you generate. It's the architecture of how every course is built.

Four steps.
Full traceability.

Every course in follows the same disciplined process. The output is a curriculum where every lesson, every assessment item, and every activity traces back to the standard it serves.

1

Define Your Standards

Import NGSS, Common Core, or your own institutional outcomes. 500+ standards, organized by framework, in seconds.

2

Map Courses to Standards

Use the alignment map to assign standards to courses at Introduce, Develop, or Master stages. Gaps and progressions visible instantly.

3

Author Aligned Courses

Write objectives, then assessments, then lessons — each linked to the standard above. Alignment is visible as you work, not verified after.

4

Publish Anywhere

Push to Canvas with one click. Export Common Cartridge for any LMS. Or print professional course documents for a teacher's binder.

Design once. Deliver everywhere.

is the design studio. Your LMS is the delivery vehicle. One click syncs your entire course — modules, assignments, quizzes, rubrics, discussions, and outcomes — directly to Canvas. Or export a Common Cartridge for Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace, or Schoology.

Canvas: Native API Sync
Modules & Structure
Assignment Groups
Weighted Grading
Pages & Lessons
Assignments
New Quizzes
Discussions
Outcomes & Rubrics
Syllabus
Common Cartridge: Any IMS-Compliant LMS
Modules & Structure
Pages & Lessons
Assignments
Syllabus
QTI Assessments
Print & PDF: No LMS Required
Course Map
Lesson Plans
Test Masters
Answer Keys
Syllabus
Alignment Map

Cross-Course Alignment Map

See which standards every course covers, at what depth, across departments and grade levels. The view accreditation reviewers wish you already had.

Four-Tier Objective Hierarchy

Standards → course objectives → unit objectives → lesson objectives. Each level linked to the one above. Aligned to QM K-12 rubric requirements.

DOK-Aware Throughout

Every objective and every assessment item carries a Depth of Knowledge level. Cognitive rigor is tracked, not assumed.

One-Click Canvas Sync

Modules, quizzes, assignments, discussions, outcomes, syllabus — all pushed to Canvas via native API. Not an export. A sync.

AI-Generated Assessments

Criterion-referenced items tied to specific objectives and DOK levels, grounded in your course materials. Not generic. Not bypassable.

Print-Ready Course Documents

Course maps, lesson plans, test masters, and alignment reports — formatted for a binder or a principal's desk. No LMS required.

Generated Assessment
Multiple ChoiceDOK 34 pts
Which rhetorical strategy does the author primarily use in paragraphs 3–5 to advance the claim that urban green spaces reduce inequality?
  • Appeal to emotion
  • Evidence-based reasoning
  • Anecdotal testimony
  • Appeal to authority
MatchingDOK 26 pts
Match each literary device to the excerpt from the passage in which it appears.
EssayDOK 410 pts
Evaluate the author's argument. Identify at least two strengths and one limitation, using textual evidence.

Every item tied to
a specific objective.

generates assessment items that are criterion-referenced to your objectives, targeted at a specific DOK level, and grounded in the materials your teachers actually use. The result: questions that require engagement with the content, not just recall of searchable facts.

  • Seven question types: MC, True/False, Multiple Answer, Matching, Ordering, Categorization, Essay
  • DOK-targeted: each item tagged with its cognitive level and aligned to a specific course objective
  • Source-grounded: generated from your uploaded materials, not from the model's training data
  • Full editing control: adjust difficulty, rewrite distractors, add custom feedback per item
  • Exports as Canvas New Quizzes, QTI for any LMS, or print-ready test masters with answer keys

Captivate is Photoshop. Canvas is the printer.
Where's InDesign?

Your team has tools for building content — Captivate, Storyline, Rise. And tools for delivering it — Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard. What's been missing is the composition layer: the place where objectives, lessons, assessments, and standards come together into a coherent, aligned course before it ships to the LMS or the classroom. is that layer.

I've sat in your seat.
This is the tool I needed.

After nearly 30 years as a teacher, technologist, learning designer, Canvas admin, and QM Master Reviewer, I've determined that the hardest problem in curriculum isn't writing good lessons. It's maintaining top-to-bottom alignment — standards to objectives, objectives to assessments, assessments to lessons — across every course in a school. Without intentionality from the start, and without the ability to see alignment as you design, real coverage is all but impossible.

I've reviewed dozens of courses against Quality Matters rubrics. I know exactly where alignment breaks down: where course objectives and unit objectives blur together, where DOK levels become afterthoughts, where standards coverage is claimed but not evidenced. is built to prevent those failures structurally, not with checklists after the fact.

If you've ever scrambled to produce a curriculum map for accreditation, or wondered whether your sophomore-level courses actually reinforce what was introduced in the freshman year, you know exactly why this exists.

Joseph Barr
Instructional Designer · Canvas Admin · QM Master Reviewer · Teacher & Founder

Ready to build curriculum
your accreditor can actually verify?

Tell me about your school, your standards, and where alignment breaks down. I'll show you how builds the rigor in.

Get in Touch